 |
HERDING INSTINCT "TEST" TO "EVALUATION"
COMMENTS |
Return to Herding Central |
|
08.16.08 |
I'm a BCSA member in good standing but I never
can seem to get the login thingy going to email right from the site.
I had an idea about the herding evaluations. I like the word "evaluation".
It summarizes what the dog is doing on that given day, leaving the door
open for progress for the dog in the future. Perhaps we could set it up so
that an owner could, after three positive "evaluations", request a "test",
where the criteria is made relatively firm for a day. A positive result
from both the evaluations and the test might encourage the owner to go
further in this great sport, to the benefit of the breed. I know there is
the HT and the PT, but this would institute the "evaluation" as a learning
experience for the dog, not just a one day test but perhaps the beginning
of its herding career. If a person is qualified to evaluate a dog, this
person is also teaching the dog during the evaluation by giving it its
first exposure to stock. After three times a dog might have learned quite
a bit. This would establish the evaluation as an opportunity to teach, and
spread the word about the purpose and history of this breed, as well as
give some dogs a chance to finally do what they really want to do.
Margaret Lass-Gardiner |
|
08.16.08 |
After reading over the changes and the posts of other
members, I feel that the Herding Instinct Testing should not be changed.
There is no reason to. And it could definitely result in less
participation, if certificates are discontinued. JMO
Judy W Wilson |
|
07.14.08 |
Having attended all of the instinct
testing days at the national specialty and seen first hand how thrilled
dog owners are with their dogs, I think the test/evaluation should
continue as it is. I don't think that changing the name will make much
difference. The majority of the people/dogs entered in instinct testing
are entirely new to herding with their dogs. They often have no idea what
their dog's reaction to sheep will be and are often very pleasantly
surprised to see their dog go straight to work. This test/evaluation is
definitely not an indication of a future herding champion but it often
creates enough lasting interest for the owner to pursue the sport further.
Denise Teal |
|
07.13.08 |
I personally like the test as it stands,
and I also don’t really understand the reason for the change. Maybe the
explanation isn’t clear enough to me. We used to have herding trials in
the Kansas City area in the 90’s, put on by the local Sheltie and Collie
clubs-this was before BCs were moved into the herding group. Our Border
Collie was used to set the sheep for the other dogs. Now we don’t have
local trials, finding trainers requires a lot of driving, and I, like
other people, am proud of the certificate that my dog received at the
Specialty last year. I like the test the way it is.
Carol Clark, Kansas City MO |
|
07.11.08 |
In regards to the Herding Instinct
Test/Evaluation semantics, I think that either word is acceptable as the
requirements you have sent can be either. However the definition of test
(according to Webster dictionary) would be more of what your guidelines
indicate ie. test is defined as "something (series of exercises) for
measuring the skill, knowledge, intelligence, capacities, or aptitudes of
an individual" and/ or test is also defined as "a critical examination,
evaluation, or observation."
As a novice herder, I like the test as it stands. It helps novice
people have a better understanding of what is required of our dogs and
keeps the herding instinct as an integral part of the Border Collie.
Passing this test, can promote more interest in us novice people. I do
think that having an evaluator who is people and dog friendly and can
offer us new people support and encouragement is a must. Having had a bad
experience at this past year's National (yes, I had the BC who broke loose
from a friend and raced out on the B course and yes, I was mortified to
have caused such a problem) and was then summarily dismissed by a judge
prior to the HT evaluation (I was in the ring a total of 30 seconds), I
was never going to herd again. However I decided to have my two youngest
dogs continue with the Instinct test. Joyce Norris who was the evaluator
made it such a wonderful experience that I came home with a desire to
continue herding. I can never be as successful or as wonderful a handler
as experienced people like you and Joyce, but if we don't get the right
experience as novices, there will be fewer people who have a keen interest
in maintaining herding as the most important part of this great breed. The
novice people are the future.
I hope I have made sense. Thank you for all that you do for club,
for herding, and for listening. You have wonderful dogs and are in a class
of handlers that I can only dream about.
Mary Pat Ezzo |
|
07.11.08 |
I feel strongly that a one-time test is not a
necessarily a good indicator of herding abilities. Many factors are
involved, including the age of the dog. A young dog is not always
"turned-on" to sheep right away. The instinct test should merely be a
one-time evaluation. Pre-trial is more of an indicator of what a dog will
be able to do.
Joanne Gamba |
|
07.09.08 |
I guess my first question is "why"? If you
want to no longer call it a test and instead use evaluation, I guess I
don't have an issue with that. That may clear up any potential confusion
for newbies between an HT and an instinct evaluation.
However, if the BCSA agrees to really down
play this and I strongly disagree with that tactic, you will lose the
interest of newbies.
I live in central Iowa, an agricultural
state. For 4 years I've driven 1 1/2 hours ONE way to herding lessons.
This year I'm in search of a new instructor because my longtime teacher is
having some serious health problems. I thought I found someone about an
hour away but it was such a negative experience, I can't go back. I won't
discuss this on a public forum but am willing to discuss it privately.
I've spent 2 years searching for land to lease for my own sheep and still
have found nothing. I've looked into other options and I'm looking at
trips of 2-5 hours one way...... I can give you the names of multiple club
members in the same dilemma as myself.
So with that said, I strongly disagree that
herding is more readily available.
Megan Harrison |
|
07.09.08 |
I like the changes and like the reasoning
behind them. I particularly like the last sentence added to explain that
evaluations are just a start and aren’t meant to give a critical test of
the dog’s trainability or usefulness. I also think the biggest benefit
from continuing this program in any form is introducing people to herding
and encouraging them to learn more about herding ability. I’m sure there
are a good number people who have started herding training with a simple
instinct evaluation.
Additional comment: Why not change the word
‘test’ under fees to ‘evaluation’ to be consistent with the rest of the
document (couple of instances)?
Richard Whorton |
|
07.09.08 |
The evaluation form looks good. My suggestion
would be that there should be places on the form for if the dog shuts
down, or stops working the stock after initially circling or showing
interest. What if, after slight corrections, the dog stops working and
runs to the gate? What if the dog stops working and starts eating poop or
grass? What if the dog starts working, then runs back to his owner? There
should be places to note those behaviors during the test.
Scott Lucken |
|
07.09.08 |
The proposed changes seem like a good idea to
me
Betty Swenson |
|
07.09.08 |
The forms look great! The only suggestion I
would like to see is on the Evaluation Form an indication of which items
checked will cause the dog 'not' to pass as opposed to which items checked
will allow the dog to pass. Does that make sense? Then when I look at my
dog's evaluation I can readily see why the evaluator did not pass my dog.
Both of my dogs passed the evaluation when
I took them to the BCSA specialty - but being a 'newbie' I had no idea why
or why not. At the specialty, the test were always so busy with people
waiting that I didn't really want to take the evaluator's time to inquire
why or why not the dog passed. I realize that it is the evaluator's
opinion, but having something in black and white indicating why they did
not pass would be helpful. Maybe, if they do not pass, the evaluator
writes down why (??).
Anyway - I like your suggestions for
updates!!
John Yaquinta |
|
07.08.08 |
The changes seem to be merely semantics, not
substantive. So, why are they being made? Is it to avoid confusion with
AKC's Herding Instinct Certification? Seems to me that any HIC is merely
an indicator of a dog's interest. As you and I both know, it really has no
value as a predictor of a dog's eventual success in herding training.
To me, the true value of BCSA's HIC program
is the way it introduces people to the idea of herding with their Border
Collie. Even though more and more trainers have become available over the
years, there are still plenty of folks who either don't have a place to go
or don't know there is a place near them. They depend on BCSA's annual HIC
program to see how their dog reacts to stock.
My only concern is whether no longer
offering the Herding Instinct Certificate would decrease participation.
Unfortunately, I fear it may do exactly that. Plenty of first time folks
are awfully proud of their dog's HIC Certificate. In fact, Carol Delsman
is now encouraging folks to cash in on that desire to get another ribbon
or certificate. At the herding judges seminars she is now telling people
to hook up with all-breed clubs and offer HIC testing at all-breed shows.
She is convinced that it not only makes a lot of money for the herding
club, but it also does encourage newcomers to the world of herding.
So, in conclusion, I personally have no
objection to changing it from a "test" to an "evaluation", but I think it
would be a mistake to stop offering certificates.
Kelly Whiteman |
|
07.08.08 |
I'm in favor of the purposed changes that I
read. I think that it is important that people don't read too much into an
HIC. It's a great way to help people see whether their dog has any
interest in the stock but you and I both know that one time in the pen
isn't always an accurate assessment of the hidden talents of a dog.
Especially if it's a very young dog or a dog that has a bit of age on it
and was never exposed to livestock as a youngster.
Other than a few spelling changes and a
couple of punctuation changes, it looks good to me.
Gail Storm |
|
07.08.08 |
It's
always hard to go back and redo something.
The proposal as I see it doesn't change the
passing requirements for the dog. All you seem to be doing is trying to de
emphasize the importance of the test/evaluation.
However, unless you change the HIT title on
dogs that have already earned it to HIE, then I think in many peoples eyes
it's going to look like a dog that has the HIT title is better than the
dog that has the HIE title. Not to people who are really into herding, but
to people who aren't into herding but are trying not to dumb down the
herding instinct, I think it will make a difference. And in reality, there
isn't any difference.
I would also like to address part of your
comment on why you think this change should be made.
"There are now many good instructors
available and clinics/camp opportunities for expanding knowledge are also
frequently available. When an individual decides to look into herding for
practical purposes or as a sport they can easily turn to instruction at a
time or place that suits them."
I think this statement is true in certain
areas of the country but definitely not in others. Most of the people I
know have long drives (1 1/2 hours or more one way) to get to herding
training. With the cost of gas there are a lot fewer new(er) people
willing to make that drive.
There are very few herding clinics
available that new people can get into. I have tried several times but the
"oldsters" have the inside track and the clinics in my area are full
before "new" people can get their dogs in.
I don't think changing the name will make
any difference to people who are really into herding. But I don't think
those are the people who are currently entering herding instinct tests.
The herding people already know how to evaluate the herding instinct in
their dogs. It's the rest of us that are pretty clueless :-).
Luann Tillman |
Page Updated
08.20.2008
|